Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1578

reference
346-tree-1
name
1578
tree-preservation-order

undefined

346-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045431 50.893916)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045332 50.893906,-1.045336 50.893925,-1.045350 50.893943,-1.045372 50.893957,-1.045399 50.893966,-1.045430 50.893970,-1.045461 50.893967,-1.045489 50.893958,-1.045511 50.893944,-1.045526 50.893927,-1.045531 50.893907,-1.045526 50.893888,-1.045513 50.893870,-1.045491 50.893856,-1.045463 50.893847,-1.045433 50.893844,-1.045402 50.893846,-1.045374 50.893855,-1.045352 50.893869,-1.045337 50.893886,-1.045332 50.893906)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL